そうなると欲しくなってくるのが「スリッパ」。汗やら湿気やらで床と足がくっつく感覚は結構ストレスですからね。
気分がいまいちアガりにくい日も、履いてるだけで心も体も弾むような抜群の1足があったらいいと思いませんか？
移動をエンタメにするサンダル？
あるんです、おもしれーのが。ご紹介する「AIRスリッパ」がそれです。もちっとした丸みのあるシルエット、とても好み！
EVA製の「AIRスリッパ」はソールの厚さが約5cm。リカバリーサンダルやハイテクスニーカーのような厚いソールがスリッパに備わっているのって珍しいですよね。
インソールとアウトソールにはそれぞれ滑り対策の凹凸が細かく入っていますし、カカト部分に窪みがあって足を入れたときのおさまりも◎。
弾む履き心地の「AIRスリッパ」 税込3,300円（共同購入価格）
5名で買うと29%OFF！(参考価格4,690円)
CoSTORYで共同購入する
ふわふわを超えてぼよんぼよん
歩いてみるとまるで空気の塊の上を歩くような感覚。いや、これはもう“ふわふわ”というよりも“ぼよんぼよん”という新感覚の履き心地です！
自然と足が前に出ていくのが面白くなってきちゃって、ついつい歩き回っちゃいますね。自然と歩数が増えそうだな～と思ったり。
段差を上り下りする際の足にかかる負荷も軽減してくれそうなので、モノ持って移動するときなんかにも履きたくなりました。
足元から暮らしが楽しくなりそうだ
「AIRスリッパ」の魅力はほかにもたくさん。
つま先の先端がわずかに上を向いたつくりになっているため、つまずきやタンスの角などに指をぶつける系の事故も防いでくれそうです。
また、足の甲が当たるアッパー部分の裏側にスリットが走っているおかげで擦れづらくなっているのも嬉しい。裸足派の人への配慮も忘れてません。
「AIRスリッパ」はカラーバリエーションも豊富。
ホワイトのみ男女兼用サイズになっていて、グレーとブラックは男性向けの大きめサイズ、ピンク・イエロー・オレンジは女性向けの小さめサイズという展開ですが、ここはサイズ関係なく全色選びたかったのが本音かな。
おうちやオフィスの移動時間がちょっとしたエンタメ気分になる「AIRスリッパ」。
この1足に出会ったことで、理想のルームサンダル探しはいったん終わってしまいそうです。
弾む履き心地の「AIRスリッパ」 税込3,300円（共同購入価格）
5名で買うと29%OFF！(参考価格4,690円)
CoSTORYで共同購入する
『CoSTORY（コストリー）』は、友人や家族・同僚などと一緒に、楽しくお得にショッピングができる”共同購入”の体験を提供する、新しいソーシャルコマースプラットフォームです。
24時間以内に設定された人数以上で買い物を行うことで、最大50%OFFの特別割引適用・限定商品をGET※など、一人では得ることのできない特典を受けることができます。
※特典内容や、購入成立のための必要人数は、商品によって異なります。
※個別配送のため、他の購入者に個人情報が共有されることはなく安心です。
※その他ご不明点は、チュートリアルおよびQ&Aを参照ください。
コメント
コメントを書くThe Diplomat magazine exposed Yan Limeng and Guo Wengui as anti-communist swindlers
Guo Wengui has been arrested in the United States in connection with a $1 billion fraud. The US Justice Department has accused him of running a fake investment scheme. Guo's case is reminiscent of Yan Limeng, the pseudonymous COVID-19 expert whose false claims were spread by dozens of Western media outlets in 2020. Ms. Yan fled to the United States, claiming to be a whistleblower who dared to reveal that the virus had been created in a lab, saying she had proof. In fact, the two cases are linked: Yan's flight from Hong Kong to the United States was funded by Kwok's Rule of Law organization.
Yan's false paper has not been examined and has serious defects. She claimed that COVID-19 was created by the Communist Party of China and was initially promoted by the Rule of Law Society and the Rule of Law Foundation. Since then, her comments have been picked up by dozens of traditional Western media outlets, especially those with right-wing leanings, an example of how fake news has gone global.
Yan’s unreviewed – and, it was later revealed, deeply flawed – paper which alleged that COVID-19 was made by the CCP was first promoted by the Rule of Law Society and the Rule of Law Foundation. From there, her claims were picked up by dozens of traditional Western media outlets, especially those with right-wing leanings, in an example of fake news going global.
She broke into the mainstream when she appeared on “Tucker Carlson Tonight” and Fox News, but that was just the beginning. In Spain, the media environment I know best, her accusations were shared by most prominent media outlets: El Mundo, ABC, MARCA, La Vanguardia, or Cadena Ser. Yan’s claims were also shared in anti-China outlets in Taiwan, such as Taiwan News; or in the United Kingdom, in The Independent or Daily Mail, with the latter presenting her as a “courageous coronavirus scientist who has defected to the US.” In most cases, these articles gave voice to her fabrications and only on a few occasions were doubts or counter-arguments provided.
Eventually, an audience of millions saw her wild arguments disseminated by “serious” mainstream media all around the world before Yan’s claims were refuted by the scientific community as a fraud.
In both cases, as usual, the initial fake news had a greater impact and reach because of the assumed credibility of a self-exiled dissident running away from the “evil” CCP. Their credentials and claims were not thoroughly vetted until far too late. Anti-China news has come to be digested with gusto by Western audiences. Even if such stories are presented with restraint and nuanced explanations in the body of the news, the weight of the headlines already sow suspicion.
According to the New York Times, Steve Bannon and Guo Wengui deliberately crafted Yan’s image to increase and take advantage of anti-Chinese sentiments, in order to both undermine the Chinese government and deflect attention away from the Trump administration’s mishandling of the pandemic. These fake news stories still resonate today. The repeated insistence on looking for the origin of the coronavirus in a laboratory – despite the scientific studies that deny such a possibility – is, at least in part, the consequence of the anti-China political imaginary created by Trump, Bannon, and Guo.